♛Stigmata Gillz©
Sound Organization
Believe in the gift of the goddess.
Posts: 1,511
|
Post by ♛Stigmata Gillz© on Jan 8, 2013 20:44:58 GMT -6
If you didn't have a good reason to own a 3DS before, you do now (good thing i already have mine.)
Credit: Props to mello for showing me the link
|
|
|
Post by Matt on Jan 8, 2013 23:48:07 GMT -6
Mhm...The X Legendary is sexy and the Fire starter is what I'm assuming is a fox so its even more sexy.
|
|
♛Stigmata Gillz©
Sound Organization
Believe in the gift of the goddess.
Posts: 1,511
|
Post by ♛Stigmata Gillz© on Jan 9, 2013 0:10:17 GMT -6
yep i believe it is a fox
|
|
|
Post by ⋆ Reddeye ⋆ on Jan 9, 2013 6:32:35 GMT -6
I'm not sure how I feel about this, but I can say I'm gonna miss the eagle vision game-play.
Also the Pokemon are getting weirder and weirder looking.
|
|
|
Post by Ichiru on Jan 9, 2013 6:52:21 GMT -6
Yeah I think they needed the use of drugs after the third region of Pokemon, to make new pokemon
|
|
|
Post by Kurei Hiitaka on Jan 9, 2013 9:27:43 GMT -6
If you want bad-looking pokemon, all I can say is don't look further than gen 1 :/ don't see why everyone says the new generation looks weird when there's been worse. There's a handful of bad ones in every gen, but gen 1 is probably the worst if you aren't looking through nostalgia-tinted glasses.
On another note: Another fire fox...hopefully it doesn't end up like Vulpix and Ninetales xD
|
|
|
Post by ⋆ Reddeye ⋆ on Jan 9, 2013 10:41:21 GMT -6
If you want bad-looking pokemon, all I can say is don't look further than gen 1 :/ don't see why everyone says the new generation looks weird when there's been worse. There's a handful of bad ones in every gen, but gen 1 is probably the worst if you aren't looking through nostalgia-tinted glasses. On another note: Another fire fox...hopefully it doesn't end up like Vulpix and Ninetales xD Gen 1 wasn't that bad. Especially since they stuck with the animal concept. Like how Pikachu looked like a mouse, Rattata looked like a rat, Pidgey looked like a pidgeon and so on. The newer pokemon don't really look like animals, but just creature designs like in Digimon or Shin Megami Tensei. Like seriously, what was Chikorita suppose to be? A lama?
|
|
|
Post by Kurei Hiitaka on Jan 9, 2013 14:54:34 GMT -6
That's what I mean by bad. When most people say the designs are ygly/bad, they mean a "lack of creativity".
There was a huge one in gen 1 lol. They've never even really said all pokemon are supposed to look like animals either 0.o noticed you didn't mention Bulbasaur, Charmander, or the actual animal pikachu's "based" off xD
Yeah, they made a few look like animals and -seem- to have kept with it through that generation (though not entirely true), but as far as creativity goes...that just proves it :/ aside from Pikachu who actually looks nothing like the animal it's based off most of them don't leave much to imagination. I've always wondered why I can't draw gen 2-5 pokemon easily like I could when I'd draw abra or pikachu (I was 8 when I was drawing the gen 1 pokes), then I look back at gen 1 and see why. XD
Asking for a true repeat of gen 1's style is saying to take a step back and lose your imagination/creativity :/
|
|
|
Post by ⋆ Reddeye ⋆ on Jan 9, 2013 14:59:41 GMT -6
But I liked the simplicity of gen 1. I think it's what gave Pokemon its charm in the first place. You could look at Squirtle as a kid and go, "Hah hah It looks like a turtle " when the Pokedex said Squirtle the "turtle" Pokemon or Charizard and laugh at how it was a lizard.
But as designs go HELL YEA the new gens are more creative. Weird, but creative.
|
|
|
Post by ChefBoyRD on Jan 9, 2013 15:12:14 GMT -6
Bitch no. Kingdom Hearts and Zelda would give the greatest of people on Earth (and Mars) more reason to get a 3DS than Pocket Monsters.
But more seriously: what generation is this? 30th by now? And MewTwo is a must
|
|
|
Post by Hiroshi on Jan 9, 2013 16:19:48 GMT -6
Yep, im certainly getting a 3DS now IM IN LOVE!
|
|
♛Stigmata Gillz©
Sound Organization
Believe in the gift of the goddess.
Posts: 1,511
|
Post by ♛Stigmata Gillz© on Jan 9, 2013 17:49:49 GMT -6
If you want bad-looking pokemon, all I can say is don't look further than gen 1 :/ don't see why everyone says the new generation looks weird when there's been worse. There's a handful of bad ones in every gen, but gen 1 is probably the worst if you aren't looking through nostalgia-tinted glasses. On another note: Another fire fox...hopefully it doesn't end up like Vulpix and Ninetales xD Gen 1 wasn't that bad. Especially since they stuck with the animal concept. Like how Pikachu looked like a mouse, Rattata looked like a rat, Pidgey looked like a pidgeon and so on. The newer pokemon don't really look like animals, but just creature designs like in Digimon or Shin Megami Tensei. Like seriously, what was Chikorita suppose to be? A lama? there were some who weren't based off an animal in gen 1, Muk and Grimer for instance.
|
|
|
Post by Kurei Hiitaka on Jan 9, 2013 19:34:41 GMT -6
A lot of them actually, or ones that people assume are based on animal but actually aren't. And ones that aren't based off the right animal as far as what fans say xD (Pika-chu)
On another note, Serebii got some interesting information. Apparently forming bonds with your pokemon will increase their power this time around.
|
|